| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |
Richard Aiel
Point of No Return
Waterboard
27
   |
Posted - 2011.11.06 08:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Meatbag Pussrocket wrote:What do you think: is this the end of suicide ganking as we know it, or the beginning of something more devious? It had better not be, or they'll need to massively nerf CONCORD to make ganking much easier than it is right now.
According to another thread and Twitter theyre doing the opposite
"If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave."
Quoth the Hillmar |
Richard Aiel
Point of No Return
Waterboard
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.06 08:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Large Collidable Object wrote:Tippia wrote:Large Collidable Object wrote:from a gameplay perspective it makes sense - which insurance would pay if you go on an amok-drive and the police wrecks your car? From a gameplay perspective, it would also make sense to remove CONCORD and leave that stuff to the faction police forces. Agreed. Unlikely it's going to happen I'm afraid. A sad day for eve.
Ive said exactly that but they seem to be going in the opposite direction instead.
"If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave."
Quoth the Hillmar |
Richard Aiel
Point of No Return
Waterboard
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 20:05:00 -
[3] - Quote
MeestaPenni wrote:Kheper Ra wrote:
Not sure I understand the logic of why hi-sec needs to be made 'more unsafe'.
I'm not sure either. In game yesterday, I opened the star map and set the legend to show me "ships destroyed in the last hour." Now, I don't know if it was a glitch or something....but by a vast majority, the greatest amount of activity in that regard was in hi-sec empire space. Someone else try that and post the results. 'Cause if I were to interpret that I would gather that hi sec is less safe than low or null sec. At least in that hour it was.
you know that counts NPC kills too? Like ratting/missioning?
"If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave."
Quoth the Hillmar |
Richard Aiel
Point of No Return
Waterboard
31
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
MeestaPenni wrote:
Unless you're providing the subscription for a particular miner, or have somehow figured out the trick of detecting what is happening on the other side of a particular miner's monitor, and it can't be categorically established that a bot is in use, you, nor I, have any particular authority to pass any judgment on any player's sense of entitlement.
Kinda in the same way CCP says we're supposed to report cxharacters we think have been recycled to avoid a sec hit.
Man thats such a ******** idea I just have to say it at least once a day
An yeah there really is no griefing in EVE, and if there is by way of a technicality in a rule somewhere, its NEVER enforced.
To the above poster: Those are BCs - battlecruisers
"If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave."
Quoth the Hillmar |
Richard Aiel
Point of No Return
Waterboard
31
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
Destiny Corrupted wrote:Salah Loveless wrote:Might have to do with the new BS's being an ultimate gank platform.
Alot of grievers crying under false pretense of no space should be safe they should fight back. Kinda like going to a preschool with a baseball bat whacking kids and claiming they should fight their own battles like men and police should not get involved.
Highsec is supposed to be safe. Why it exist. CCP is punishing some carebears with this, and I of course refer to carebear pvpers that can only pvp in the safety of highsec, because like their mission running prey, are to afraid to enter low sec.
He maybe no High sec war dec would make sense? It will force the carebear pvpers even more so to actually stop being carebears and go to lowsec . Because if they are going to force some carebears into lowsec why not the ones crying 24/7 over lack of PvP opportunities? Besides what police/government is going to let what amounts to gang warfare happen right in their own back yard?
Anyone else got Ideas on how to get these carebears into the PvP they claim to crave?
So you propose that everyone in high-sec be given absolute pvp immunity? Interesting. I guess I'll start up a few dozen bot alts, run them 23.5/7/365, and flood the market so badly that you won't be able to find a reason to undock ever again, no matter how much you try to rub your two brain cells together. PS: The reason we don't go to lowsec isn't because we're scared (we're not you, stop self-projecting), but because it's empty. Maybe you should visit it sometime, so you have some qualification to make claims about it.
The reason I dont go into 0.0 often is cause low-sec ISNT empty. Its full of gatecamps that make it impossible to GET into 0.0 unless you do it minutes after DT is over lol
"If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave."
Quoth the Hillmar |
Richard Aiel
Point of No Return
Waterboard
31
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 05:27:00 -
[6] - Quote
Salah Loveless wrote:
Boting, if I am not mistaken is bannable. Seems much like the Iraq war switched from WMD's to freeing the people once WMD proved false all the carebear pvpers are changing from PvP should stay in EvE to we need to stop bots and afk mining profit once it was pointed out that they are more than free to leave their carebear lives and go PvP in null sec. Has anyone else notice the change?
New version of Godwin's Law?
"If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave."
Quoth the Hillmar |
Richard Aiel
Point of No Return
Waterboard
32
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 21:03:00 -
[7] - Quote
Andski wrote:Tanya Powers wrote:
The normal progression should always be, high sec, low sec, null sec.
It's not and never was, but keep thinking that.
Hate to agree with a Goon but there IS NO progression in this game, and nor should there be IF the game is the sandbox ppl pretend it is.
"If the unfaithful would rage-quit, let them do so. And let not the gates of New Eden strike them 'pon the ass ere they leave."
Quoth the Hillmar |
| |
|